"Have conversations with people you disagree with"

"People are products of their time.

We must remember this and approach others with empathy and compassion."

Picture a room where a writer sits across from Abbas Khan, palms slightly damp, about to pitch six months of their life compressed into a fifteen-minute presentation. They've rehearsed this. They believe in it. And Khan is about to do the hardest thing his job requires: recognize the quality, honor the effort, and still say no.

Not because the idea lacks merit. Because merit isn't enough.

This is the invisible architecture of creative industries—the moments between yes and no where entire futures pivot on someone's ability to see clearly. Khan, an executive producer at Excel Entertainment whose work on projects like Mirzapur has helped reshape India's digital content landscape, has spent his career learning to inhabit that uncomfortable space with integrity.

"The toughest part of my job is saying no to ideas that aren't feasible, even if they are creatively strong," he explains. It's the sentence that reveals everything about what producing actually is. Not the glamorous part—championing vision, greenlighting dreams. The grinding, daily part: being the person who translates possibility into reality without killing what made the possibility beautiful in the first place.

Khan didn't start here. He started wanting to be a director, working his way up through the traditional path: assistant director, intern, first AD on features and commercials. It was the accessible route for someone without technical credentials, the way you got close enough to set to learn how films actually get made. He watched. He absorbed. He noticed patterns.

Particularly when working with international crews and more structured production systems, one pattern became undeniable: in Western industries, first ADs rarely transition into directing. They become producers. The skill set is too aligned—systems thinking, coordination, management, the ability to hold an entire production in your mind and solve problems in real-time before they become crises.

For Khan, shaped by a military upbringing that taught comfort with structure and pragmatism, the realization wasn't bitter. It was clarifying. "For me, it wasn't a bitter pill to swallow," he reflects. "It was a personal, pragmatic decision." He recognized where his actual talents lived, and more importantly, he understood something most people spend careers failing to grasp: you can hold multiple ambitions simultaneously if you're honest about timing and conviction.

He still wants to direct. But he's waiting for a story he can back entirely, something that demands his complete conviction. In the meantime, producing isn't compromise—it's the work that lets him engage creatively every single day while building the skills and relationships that will matter when that story finally arrives.

This is the insight that makes Khan's journey profound: Creative fulfillment doesn't require immediate gratification of every ambition. Strategic patience isn't the same as resignation. It's wisdom.

"Every producer has to be creative," Khan insists, dismantling the stereotype that still clings to the role—producer as financier, as gatekeeper, as the person whose job is to say no to everything fun. "Otherwise, you're not agreeing… You have to constantly problem solve." Producers are intrinsic creative partners, the people who can hold both vision and constraint simultaneously, who can see what's possible within what's practical.

But yes, they do have to say no. Often. And Khan has learned that how you say no might be more important than the no itself.

"The responsibility is not to lead creators on if a project isn't likely to go forward," he explains. "I believe in being honest and direct." Picture that room again: the writer who's poured everything into this pitch. The cruel option is letting them believe yes is coming when you know it isn't. The kind option—the one that actually respects their time, their talent, their vulnerability—is clarity. Even when clarity stings.

This is the operating philosophy underlying everything Khan does: productive discomfort. Not suffering for aesthetics, but the deliberate choice to remain in spaces where growth happens. The discomfort of honest self-assessment about his skills. The discomfort of challenging writers to fight for their vision while knowing he might still say no. The discomfort of making judgment calls without perfect information. The discomfort of waiting for directing opportunities worthy of his conviction rather than accepting anything available.

The current content landscape makes this philosophy more urgent. Streaming platforms offer data analytics that promise to remove uncertainty from creative decisions. Audience tastes fragment into endless micro-niches. Content length adjusts based on algorithms and viewing patterns. The seduction is powerful: let the data decide. Optimize for metrics. Remove human judgment.

Khan acknowledges the data but refuses to be ruled by it. "Decisions should be driven by creative instinct rather than algorithms," he argues. This isn't romantic idealism—it's practical wisdom. Data tells you what worked yesterday. Only instinct can tell you what might work tomorrow. The balance between creative instinct and market reality is "the toughest part," he admits. "Balancing creative instincts with practicality, feasibility, and understanding market needs."

This is the operating philosophy underlying everything Khan does: productive discomfort. Not suffering for aesthetics, but the deliberate choice to remain in spaces where growth happens. The discomfort of honest self-assessment about his skills. The discomfort of challenging writers to fight for their vision while knowing he might still say no. The discomfort of making judgment calls without perfect information. The discomfort of waiting for directing opportunities worthy of his conviction rather than accepting anything available.

The current content landscape makes this philosophy more urgent. Streaming platforms offer data analytics that promise to remove uncertainty from creative decisions. Audience tastes fragment into endless micro-niches. Content length adjusts based on algorithms and viewing patterns. The seduction is powerful: let the data decide. Optimize for metrics. Remove human judgment.

Khan acknowledges the data but refuses to be ruled by it. "Decisions should be driven by creative instinct rather than algorithms," he argues. This isn't romantic idealism—it's practical wisdom. Data tells you what worked yesterday. Only instinct can tell you what might work tomorrow. The balance between creative instinct and market reality is "the toughest part," he admits. "Balancing creative instincts with practicality, feasibility, and understanding market needs."

Also Read

Rajneel Kumar

Arguably one of the most influential men in the world of Lights & Camera - This legend is more than just a technician; He is an artist.

Dhritiman Mukherjee

Curiosity may have killed the cat, but Dhritiman was there to document it. An explorer with the DNA for discovery makes him the ultimate.

Kalpesh Damani

Perceived reality, Designed consciousness. She is a master at her craft but leads with the heart of a gentle soul - keeping her ethos always at core.